logo
spacer
spacer

 eWombat Search 
>
spacer spacer spacer
Latest Accounting News
Hot Issues
How is your super going, ready for retirement?
ATO increasing data exchange with international regulators
Illegal SMSF early access scheme leads to $6,000 fine
Our 'hardest' SMSF tasks
Uber drivers hit for 10% tax
Lack of literacy promotes unrealistic goals
Taxpayer failed to prove that payments were “loans”
New STP dates confirmed as ATO goes on compliance blitz
ATO flags compliance project for FY17/18
Items that heat up your depreciation deductions
Doing a budget is a good idea but ....
Government ‘undermines’ tax system in new moves on property expenses
Taxpayer denied deduction for work expenses of $60,000
Overtime meal expenses disallowed because no allowance received
Key Economic Indicators, 2017
Government to shut down salary sacrifice loophole
Crowdfunding legislation gets greenlight
ATO heavyweight responds to hacking fears
Checklist - Individuals Tax Returns - 2017
Checklist - Tax time 2017 - Company, Trust & Partnership
Checklist - Superannuation Funds - 2017
ATO to ramp up scrutiny of $20K tax break use
‘Bank-like heists’ make way for new wave of cyber crime
ATO reports on key contraventions for 2016-17
ATO, mid-tiers warn on common expenses myths
SMSF trustees told to take action on contributions
Higher instant asset write-off threshold for small business extended
Australian population figures
Articles archive
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Taxpayer failed to prove that payments were “loans”

In a recent case, the Full Federal Court has found that several taxpayer companies had not discharged the onus of proving that assessments the Commissioner of Taxation issued to them were excessive. 



       


 


The amended assessments added income of some $4 million that the Australian companies received from overseas sources, which taxpayers had claimed were loans.


In agreeing with the Commissioner, the Court majority held that it would not be appropriate to find that the taxpayers had provided the required proof that the payments were genuine loans; in fact, they had made inconsistent or “alternative” arguments about the nature of the payments.


This case again demonstrates – good evidence gives the taxpayer a chance (of winning a tax debate).


 


AcctWeb




12th-September-2017